Current:Home > ContactAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -AssetVision
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-14 18:08:32
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (6817)
Related
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Utah man dies in avalanche while backcountry skiing in western Montana
- Half a century after murdered woman's remains were found in Connecticut, she's been identified
- Race for Chicago-area prosecutor seat features tough-on-crime judge, lawyer with Democratic backing
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- TikTok bill that could lead to ban faces uphill climb in the Senate
- Top 5 landing spots for wide receiver Mike Williams after Chargers release him
- South Dakota prosecutors to seek death penalty for man charged with killing deputy during a pursuit
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Ukrainian ministers ‘optimistic’ about securing U.S. aid, call for repossession of Russian assets
Ranking
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Regents pick New Hampshire provost to replace UW-La Crosse chancellor fired over porn career
- When is Selection Sunday for women’s March Madness? When brackets will be released.
- '1 in 400 million': Rare cow with two heads, four eyes born at a farm in Louisiana
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Realtor.com adds climate change risk features; 40% of US homes show risks of heat, wind, air quality
- Pro-Palestinian faculty sue to stop Penn from giving wide swath of files to Congress
- Kentucky House passes a bill aimed at putting a school choice constitutional amendment on the ballot
Recommendation
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Love Is Blind Season 6 Reunion Is Here: Find Out Where the Couples Stand Now
New York trooper found not guilty in fatal shooting of motorist following high-speed chase
Georgia judge tosses some charges against Trump and others in 2020 election case
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Going abroad? Time to check if you're up to date on measles immunity, CDC says
Ex-rideshare driver accused in California antisemitic attack charged with federal hate crime
Chick-fil-A to open first mobile pickup restaurant: What to know about the new concept