Current:Home > MarketsNew Mexico Democrats push to criminalize fake electors before presidential vote -AssetVision
New Mexico Democrats push to criminalize fake electors before presidential vote
View
Date:2025-04-27 20:47:06
SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — New Mexico Democrats who control the Legislature want to make it a crime to pose as a fake presidential elector in one of the few states where Republicans signed certificates in 2020 falsely declaring Donald Trump the winner.
Legislators advanced a bill Friday on a party-line committee vote that would make it a felony starting in the 2024 presidential election to submit a fake elector certificate “knowingly or recklessly.” The Legislature’s Republican minority would need Democratic support to vote down the legislation, which carries criminal penalties like those being considered in a handful of other states.
Republican electors signed certificates in seven states — mostly with battleground contests — indicating falsely that Trump had won the 2020 election, a strategy at the center of criminal charges against Trump and his associates.
In New Mexico, President Joe Biden won by 11 percentage points, or about 100,000 votes — the largest margin among the states where so-called fake electors have been implicated.
Last year, Nevada Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo vetoed a bill that would have made it a crime to sign certificates falsely stating that a losing political candidate has won, with penalties of between four and 10 years in prison. In Colorado, where there were no false elector certificates in 2020, the Democratic-led Legislature is considering a bill that would make participating in a fake elector scheme a crime and ban people who do from office.
New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez, a Democrat, in January announced his decision not to prosecute local Republicans who signed the elector certificates — while urging lawmakers to provide legal authority for prosecuting similar conduct in the future and enhance the security of the state’s electoral process.
“We should recognize the seriousness of this conduct,” he told a state Senate panel in January.
On Friday in Santa Fe, Republican state Rep. Bill Rehm of Albuquerque said the legislation is “politically motivated against a different party.” He voted against it, noting that felony provisions are especially stiff. Violations would be punishable by up to three years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000. Fake electors didn’t change Biden’s win in 2020, he said.
“I do not think there was any intent in New Mexico to change the outcome,” he said. “I think that if we could remove the politics that is the undertone of this, it would be a different situation.”
In New Mexico and Pennsylvania, fake electors added a caveat saying the certificate was submitted in case they were later recognized as duly elected, qualified electors. That would only have been possible if Trump had won any of several dozen legal battles he waged against states in the weeks after the election.
Democratic officials have launched separate investigations in some states, resulting in indictments against GOP electors.
In December, a Nevada grand jury indicted six Republicans with felony charges in connection with false election certificates. They have pleaded not guilty.
Michigan’s Attorney General filed felony charges in July 2023 against 16 Republican fake electors, including forgery and conspiracy to commit election forgery. For one of them, charges were dropped after reaching a cooperation deal. The top charge carried a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison.
Three fake electors also have been charged in Georgia alongside Trump and others in a sweeping indictment accusing them of participating in a wide-ranging scheme to illegally overturn the results of the presidential election. They have pleaded not guilty.
The New Mexico bill, from Democrats including Majority House Floor Leader Gail Chasey of Albuquerque, also would establish felony penalties for disrupting election results — defined as knowingly or recklessly suppressing, defacing, altering, forging or otherwise falsifying election documents, or preparing or submitting false election documents.
Republican Party of New Mexico Chairman Steve Pearce has accused the state attorney general of trying to criminalize a process “used by both Democrats and Republicans,” referring to the 1960 presidential election. Democratic electors in Hawaii cast votes for John F. Kennedy despite that state initially being called for Republican Richard Nixon.
But the outcome of the Hawaii election was unclear, requiring a recount, and Nixon would end up losing the state. After the 2020 election, every court challenge the Trump campaign and its allies filed to contest his loss has failed.
veryGood! (19)
Related
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Microsoft revamps Bing search engine to use artificial intelligence
- If you got inflation relief from your state, the IRS wants you to wait to file taxes
- A Plunge in Mass Transit Ridership Deals a Huge Blow to Climate Change Mitigation
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Amazon Shoppers Swear By This $22 Pack of Boy Shorts to Prevent Chafing While Wearing Dresses
- Don’t Wait! Stock Up On These 20 Dorm Must-Haves Now And Save Yourself The Stress
- Gunman who killed 11 people at Pittsburgh synagogue is found eligible for death penalty
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- My 600-Lb. Life’s Larry Myers Jr. Dead at 49
Ranking
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Surface Water Vulnerable to Widespread Pollution From Fracking, a New Study Finds
- Latest on Ukraine: EU just banned Russian diesel and other oil products (Feb. 6)
- Biden calls for passage of a bill to stop 'junk fees' in travel and entertainment
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Inside Clean Energy: How Soon Will An EV Cost the Same as a Gasoline Vehicle? Sooner Than You Think.
- The Rate of Global Warming During Next 25 Years Could Be Double What it Was in the Previous 50, a Renowned Climate Scientist Warns
- The Rate of Global Warming During Next 25 Years Could Be Double What it Was in the Previous 50, a Renowned Climate Scientist Warns
Recommendation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Biden’s Pause of New Federal Oil and Gas Leases May Not Reduce Production, but It Signals a Reckoning With Fossil Fuels
Bebe Rexha Breaks Silence After Concertgoer Is Arrested for Throwing Phone at Her in NYC
Is it hot in here, or is it just the new jobs numbers?
Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
American Petroleum Institute Chief Promises to Fight Biden and the Democrats on Drilling, Tax Policy
Amazon Prime Day 2023: Everything You Need to Know to Get the Best Deals
In the Arctic, Less Sea Ice and More Snow on Land Are Pushing Cold Extremes to Eastern North America
Like
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- EPA to Probe Whether North Carolina’s Permitting of Biogas From Swine Feeding Operations Violates Civil Rights of Nearby Neighborhoods
- Warming Trends: Shakespeare, Dogs and Climate Change on British TV; Less Crowded Hiking Trails; and Toilet Paper Flunks Out