Current:Home > MySenate establishes official dress code days after ditching it -AssetVision
Senate establishes official dress code days after ditching it
View
Date:2025-04-17 15:30:04
Washington — Days after relaxing its unofficial dress code, the Senate passed a resolution requiring business attire when senators are on the floor of the chamber.
The change follows a recent decision by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat of New York, to stop enforcing the unofficial requirement and allow members to wear casual attire on the Senate floor. But Schumer noted he would continue to wear a suit.
The decision prompted swift backlash, especially toward Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, who typically wears a hoodie and gym shorts to work.
On Wednesday, the Senate adopted the formal dress code by unanimous consent, requiring a coat, tie and slacks, or long pants for men. It does not include any specific requirements for women.
"Though we've never had a formal dress code, the events over the past week have made us all feel as though formalizing [a dress code] is the right path forward. I deeply appreciate Sen. Fetterman working with me to come to an agreement that we all find acceptable," Schumer said Wednesday.
The resolution was introduced by Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republican Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah.
"For 234 years, every senator who has had the honor of serving in this distinguished body has assumed that there was some basic written rules of decorum, conduct and civility, one of which was a dress code," Manchin said. "We thought maybe it's time we finally codify something that was precedented rule for 234 years."
After the vote, Fetterman released a statement that included no words, only a photograph of actor Kevin James smirking.
— Alan He contributed reporting.
- In:
- United States Senate
- Joe Manchin
- Chuck Schumer
- John Fetterman
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter for CBS News Digital. Reach her at caitlin.yilek@cbsinteractive.com. Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/hausofcait
TwitterveryGood! (51)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- 'Joker 2' actor pans DC sequel as the 'worst film' ever: 'It has no plot'
- Sister Wives’ Madison Brush Details Why She Went “No Contact” With Dad Kody Brown
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, 4G
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- California voters reject proposed ban on forced prison labor in any form
- California voters reject proposed ban on forced prison labor in any form
- 2025 NFL Draft order: Updated first round picks after Week 10 games
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Digital Finance Research Institute Introduce
Ranking
- Small twin
- Kirk Herbstreit berates LSU fans throwing trash vs Alabama: 'Enough is enough, clowns'
- These Yellowstone Gift Guide Picks Will Make You Feel Like You’re on the Dutton Ranch
- Judith Jamison, a dancer both eloquent and elegant, led Ailey troupe to success over two decades
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Brian Kelly asks question we're all wondering after Alabama whips LSU, but how to answer?
- Report: Jaguars' Trevor Lawrence could miss rest of season with shoulder injury
- Lane Kiffin puts heat on CFP bracket after Ole Miss pounds Georgia. So, who's left out?
Recommendation
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Is the stock market open on Veterans Day? What to know ahead of the federal holiday
'Joker 2' actor pans DC sequel as the 'worst film' ever: 'It has no plot'
Is the stock market open on Veterans Day? What to know ahead of the federal holiday
Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
'I was in total shock': Woman wins $1 million after forgetting lotto ticket in her purse
Climate Advocacy Groups Say They’re Ready for Trump 2.0
Wisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid